9158 2016-02-23 21:48:26 +0000 Cannot build openjdk-8 on fido due to missing autotools patch 2016-09-30 16:38:31 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 1.8.2 x86 Multiple RESOLVED WONTFIX Medium normal 1.8.3 1 henry.bruce ross.burton meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher sgw --- --- No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 59412 0 henry.bruce 2016-02-23 21:48:26 +0000 openjdk-8 requires the "Allow recipe-individual configure scripts" autotools.bbclass patch (see commit id 753f31e) that has been applied to master, but not fido. As a result openjdk-8 will build on master but not on fido. Part of the openjdk-8 work includes a start at removing the x11 dependency to allow truly headless builds (not yet completed). As fido is still supported, it should benefit from this progress. Steps to reproduce: - get poky and meta-java from master - added meta-java path to bblayers.conf - add the following to local.conf CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += "openjre-8" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/java-initial-native = "cacao-initial-native" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/java-native = "jamvm-native" PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/javac-native = "ecj-bootstrap-native" - bitbake core-image-minimal - see error below | DEBUG: Executing python function sysroot_cleansstate | DEBUG: Python function sysroot_cleansstate finished | DEBUG: SITE files ['endian-little', 'common-linux', 'common-glibc', 'bit-64', 'x86_64-linux', 'common'] | DEBUG: Executing shell function autotools_preconfigure | DEBUG: Shell function autotools_preconfigure finished | DEBUG: Executing python function autotools_copy_aclocals | DEBUG: Python function autotools_copy_aclocals finished | DEBUG: Executing shell function do_configure | ERROR: no configure script found at build/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/openjdk-8-native/72b05-r0/jdk8u-e8bed1496ff2/configure 59798 1 ross.burton 2016-03-08 17:07:23 +0000 I'm a bit concerned about the impact of that patch - it's non-trivial. Would it be possible for meta-java's fido branch to ship its own copy of the autotools class (renamed to avoid conflicts)? I can produce a patch if you could test it. 59808 2 henry.bruce 2016-03-08 21:19:59 +0000 I understand you concern regarding the complexity of the patch. meta-java does not have yocto release branches (just master and master-next) so fido specific approach would not work. iot-devkit and ostro teams forked meta-java to get openjdk-8 building before it became available upstream. I can look at those options as place holder. 59809 3 ross.burton 2016-03-08 21:43:25 +0000 Well, easy enough to add a fido branch. Or, add the new class to master and always use it with a note that it's an interim solution until fido is unsupported. 65403 4 henry.bruce 2016-08-22 17:12:47 +0000 Happy to close this as "Will Not Fix" as fido is now in community support. Also recent changes to meta-java means it now only builds with krogoth. 66766 5 henry.bruce 2016-09-30 16:38:31 +0000 Closing as meta-java requires krogoth or later.