9183 2016-02-29 18:21:37 +0000 [Test Case 570] Check if target can support EEPROM - Failed EEPROM was not found 2016-03-03 16:45:37 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime BSPs bsps-runtime 2.1 NUC Multiple VERIFIED INVALID http://yocto-ab-master.jf.intel.com/pub/releases/yocto-2.1_M2.rc1/machines/intel-corei7-64/core-image-sato-sdk-intel-corei7-64.hddimg Undecided normal 1.4.5 1 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez sgw alexandru.c.georgescu sgw yp.kernel.watcher yp.watcher francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez --- Regression (Used to work) No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 59542 0 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez 2016-02-29 18:21:37 +0000 STATUS: FAILED BUILD: meta-intel : aaab29ad036b13a0959925329b2b8e471869ca53 ENVIRONMENT: corei7 on NUC ( D54250WYK) STEPS TO REPRODUCE: Check eeprom device exist in /sys/bus/i2c/devices/ Run "hexdump eeprom" command root@mpc8315e-rdb:/sys/bus/i2c/devices/1-0051> hexdump eeprom 0000000 9210 0b02 0211 0009 0b52 0108 0c00 3c00 0000010 6978 6930 6911 208c 7003 3c3c 00f0 8381 … EXPECTED OUTCOME: Hexdump can read data from eeprom ACTUAL OUTCOME: "EEPRO" was not found under /sys/bus/i2c/devices 59672 1 sgw 2016-03-03 15:47:49 +0000 What is the actual test case here? It appears that you are saying your running on a NUC, but the prompt shows running on a PPC machine. If this is an actual bug, please re-open this one with the additional and correct information. 59678 2 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez 2016-03-03 16:32:17 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > What is the actual test case here? > > It appears that you are saying your running on a NUC, but the prompt shows > running on a PPC machine. > > If this is an actual bug, please re-open this one with the additional and > correct information. Hi Saul, By mistake I cloned a wrong template on testopia, and another test cases were run by mistake, I am agree with you. It is Invalid. 59679 3 alexandru.c.georgescu 2016-03-03 16:44:18 +0000 invalid 59680 4 francisco.j.pedraza.gonzalez 2016-03-03 16:45:37 +0000 By mistake I cloned a wrong template on testopia, and another test cases were run by mistake, I am agree with you. It is Invalid.