<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>9290</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2016-03-17 15:48:05 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[meta-swupd] bundle removal only partially works</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-04-18 12:45:48 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>7</classification_id>
          <classification>Build System, Metadata &amp; Runtime</classification>
          <product>Other YP Layers</product>
          <component>meta-swupd</component>
          <version>2.1</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.1 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Joshua Lock">joshuagloe</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Joshua Lock">joshuagloe</assigned_to>
          <cc>dmitry.rojkov</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.bs.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.watcher</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>No (bug/feature does not impact docs)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>60091</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Lock">joshuagloe</who>
    <bug_when>2016-03-17 15:48:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From #9039 comment 14[1]:

&quot;Update: we confirmed today that handling of bundles works only partially.
Not because of the finding listed so far, which seem to be &quot;normal&quot;, but because the removal of bundles is not working correctly (0 files removed).&quot;

It&apos;s not yet clear whether this is a bug in the version of swupd-client, an issue with the manifests generated by swupd-server (which may or may not be attributed to the patches we&apos;re applying) or a bug in the swupd-image.bbclass

1. https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9039#c14</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61316</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Lock">joshuagloe</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-17 21:21:05 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Dmitry submitted a backport for 2.87 which resolves this issue. We should either update to 3.5.0 to get the same fix for the 3.x series.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61321</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Dmitry Rozhkov">dmitry.rojkov</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-18 07:20:17 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #1)
&gt; Dmitry submitted a backport for 2.87 which resolves this issue. We should
&gt; either update to 3.5.0 to get the same fix for the 3.x series.

My bad, I put a misleading label to the Update-Status. I&apos;ve double-checked and the fix is present in v3.0.0.

So the 3.x branch is not affected by this bug.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61334</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Joshua Lock">joshuagloe</who>
    <bug_when>2016-04-18 12:45:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(In reply to comment #2)
&gt; (In reply to comment #1)
&gt; &gt; Dmitry submitted a backport for 2.87 which resolves this issue. We should
&gt; &gt; either update to 3.5.0 to get the same fix for the 3.x series.
&gt; 
&gt; My bad, I put a misleading label to the Update-Status. I&apos;ve double-checked
&gt; and the fix is present in v3.0.0.
&gt; 
&gt; So the 3.x branch is not affected by this bug.

Excellent, marking this issue as resolved. Thanks for the patch!</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>