<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.6"
          urlbase="https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/"
          
          maintainer="it-coreprojects-helpdesk@linuxfoundation.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>9580</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2016-05-03 21:25:23 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Missing package dependency in quick start guide for Fedora</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2016-09-01 22:59:39 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>9</classification_id>
          <classification>Documentation</classification>
          <product>Quick Start</product>
          <component>quick-start</component>
          <version>2.0.2</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Multiple</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard>01 Sept 2016: RESOLVED</status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>Medium</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>2.2 M4</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Henry Bruce">henry.bruce</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</assigned_to>
          <cc>bluelightning</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.doc.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>poky.watcher</cc>
    
    <cc>ross.burton</cc>
    
    <cc>srifenbark</cc>
    
    <cc>tim.orling</cc>
          
          
          <cf_os>---</cf_os>
          <cf_regression_type>---</cf_regression_type>
          
          <cf_docchange>Done (doc changes complete)</cf_docchange>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61906</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry Bruce">henry.bruce</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-03 21:25:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>perl-bignum package is required to build core-image-minimal with qemux86 machine but is not a required package in quick start guide.

Host OS is Fedora23 64 bit.

Expected behavior
------------------
Follow quick start guide and image builds.

Observed behavior
-----------------
Follow quick start guide and build fails as follows
ERROR: The perl module &apos;bignum&apos; was not found but this is required to build openssl.  Please install this module (often packaged as perl-bignum) and re-run bitbake.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61909</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 05:13:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Fedora package list in the 2.1 quick start guide already include perl-bignum - were you perhaps looking at the &quot;current&quot; manual link before that got updated (just yesterday, a bit later than it should have been)?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61911</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry Bruce">henry.bruce</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 06:52:04 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I was looking at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.0.1/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html, thus the 2.0.x version tag.

There is not 2.0.1 tag, but I guess that&apos;s a different defect :-)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61913</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 08:37:37 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>As I recall this package only appeared in F23 and F23 wasn&apos;t supported by 2.0 - Ross is that right?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61914</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Paul Eggleton">bluelightning</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 08:38:24 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>(Though one would assume we would look to support it in the next 2.0 point release, so I&apos;m not really questioning the validity of the report)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>61959</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-04 20:19:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Yeah its a F23 specific package from what I can remember.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>62015</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Ross Burton">ross.burton</who>
    <bug_when>2016-05-06 11:18:34 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Scott, can we add a note to the 2.0 documentation?  Something along the lines that the 2.0 isn&apos;t supported under F23 but if you want to use it then the user has to install perl-bignum too.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>62682</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-06 21:11:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ross and Paul, 

I am not quite sure where we are in the latest 2.0.x release.  I have a 2.0.2 version of the manuals and I placed this note here about not supporting F23 and if you want to use it you need that package.  

It is a pain in the ass but I could fix the 2.0 and 2.0.1 versions of the QS to have the note as well.  However, only the HTML version on the YP site would have the fix.  I can&apos;t do a commit since 2.0, 2.0.1, and 2.0.2 are all on the same &apos;jethro&apos; branch.  

Is that good enough?  Here is the new note:

http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.0.2/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html#packages

Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>63358</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2016-06-27 18:00:31 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Please review this change and let me know if we can RESOLVE it in the status. 

Thanks, 
Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>65745</commentid>
    <comment_count>9</comment_count>
    <who name="Tim Orling">tim.orling</who>
    <bug_when>2016-09-01 22:30:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>this aspect at least is RESOLVED</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>65748</commentid>
    <comment_count>10</comment_count>
    <who name="Scott Rifenbark">srifenbark</who>
    <bug_when>2016-09-01 22:59:39 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Tim, 

Thanks - I set the doc flag to &quot;done.&quot;

Scott</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>