9712 2016-06-06 13:36:52 +0000 buildhistory-diff depends on python3-git, which is not in Debian Stable 2017-12-06 16:55:15 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core Scripts and Tools unspecified x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED 8 June 2016: IN PROGRESS REVIEW Medium+ normal 2.2 M1 1 jku eduard.bartosh jose.perez.carranza leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez ross.burton srifenbark --- Regression (Used to work) Done (doc changes complete) oldest_to_newest 62652 0 jku 2016-06-06 13:36:52 +0000 buildhistory-diff fails on Debian Stable because python3-git is not available. python3-git is in jessie-backports but that's not enabled by default. So if we consider this as just a documentation bug, we would have to document how to enable backports on Debian... 62700 1 eduard.bartosh 2016-06-07 12:41:27 +0000 This also true for OpenSUSE 13.2 and 42.1 It's even worse on OpenSUSE as it doesn't have even python-git in default installation. There are plenty of choices how to deal with this: - find and install python3-git as Jussi suggested - install GitPython with pip3: pip3 install GitPython --user - run script with python 2 explicitly: python ../scripts/buildhistory-diff - refer to python 2 in script's shebang: #!/usr/bin/env python Changing documentation looks better than going back to python 2 from my point of view. 62714 2 srifenbark 2016-06-07 17:34:09 +0000 This section (http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#examining-build-history-information) talks about running buildhistory-diff. Outside of a mention in the migration section, which probably does not apply, that is the only area where buildhistory-diff is specifically shown. Would a "NOTE" be sufficient here? One thing I thought was going to happen with post 2.1 is that Python 3 would be part of the release. If so, wouldn't this issue go away for future releases of YP? Scott 62756 3 eduard.bartosh 2016-06-08 09:16:18 +0000 I think NOTE should be enough. Would something like this be ok? Buildhistory-diff requries GitPython package. Please, install it with pip3: pip3 install GitPython --user Or install python3-git package using distro package manager(apt-get, dnf or zipper) 62761 4 eduard.bartosh 2016-06-08 11:05:02 +0000 > One thing I thought was going to happen with post 2.1 is that Python 3 would be part of the release. If so, wouldn't this issue go away for future releases of YP? No it wouldn't as it was caused by the move to Python 3. 62773 5 srifenbark 2016-06-08 15:52:36 +0000 Hi, Check out the new note at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#examining-build-history-information and let me know if this is okay. Thanks, Scott 62774 6 srifenbark 2016-06-08 15:53:31 +0000 Oops... I just realized I am not the owner of this bug. I did change the state Ed. Sorry. Scott 62802 7 eduard.bartosh 2016-06-09 07:15:01 +0000 Thank you for updating the documentation! The change looks good to me. There is just one small typo in there: "Alternatively, you can install python3-3" should be "Alternatively, you can install python3-git" Jussi, are you ok with the change? 62804 8 jku 2016-06-09 07:23:09 +0000 (In reply to comment #7) > Jussi, are you ok with the change? Sure. 62816 9 leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez 2016-06-09 14:39:04 +0000 a similar issue: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9690 62842 10 srifenbark 2016-06-09 16:25:37 +0000 Ed, Don't know how I managed that typo :) Fixed it - see http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#examining-build-history-information Thanks, Scott 62905 11 srifenbark 2016-06-10 17:23:19 +0000 Thanks... I am putting the doc flag to Done. It was set at "No" but it did involve the docs. Scott 62913 12 eduard.bartosh 2016-06-13 07:43:21 +0000 Thank you!