9897 2016-07-08 07:41:23 +0000 [Krogoth] Failed to build pkgconfig-native on Fedora24 2016-07-28 15:29:41 +0000 1 1 7 Build System, Metadata & Runtime OE-Core core 2.1.1 x86 Multiple RESOLVED FIXED High normal 2.1.1 1 yi.zhao tim.orling akuster jose.perez.carranza meta.mr.watcher meta.watcher sgw yi.zhao yi.zhao --- New (Never tested) No (bug/feature does not impact docs) oldest_to_newest 63749 0 yi.zhao 2016-07-08 07:41:23 +0000 git rev: krogoth/98c57bb512ea6790db8604fcf0b88c81651d2ab4 Steps: $ . ./oe-init-build-env $ bitbake pkgconfig-native Error log: ##################### ../../../git/glib/glib/gdate.c: In function 'g_date_strftime': ../../../git/glib/glib/gdate.c:2497:7: error: format not a string literal, format string not checked [-Werror=format-nonliteral] tmplen = strftime (tmpbuf, tmpbufsize, locale_format, &tm); ^~~~~~ ##################### I attached the full log. There is a patch on master to fix the build with gcc6: commit b83a808fcbd3e7aec3b0757c7180cf83dac44e92 Author: Dan McGregor <dan.mcgregor@usask.ca> Date: Wed May 11 10:35:15 2016 -0700 pkgconfig: Fix build with gcc-6 and upgrade to 0.29.1 glib patch is backported from glib-2.0 upstream eventually we will throw it away once pkgconfig moves to newer glib (From OE-Core rev: bad18b8f8954e2cf3f2edb4707f582db5905ccb2) Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> Maybe we need to backport it ? 63786 1 ross.burton 2016-07-11 10:42:27 +0000 Yes, can you backport just the gdate gcc patch to krogoth and post the patch? 63829 2 yi.zhao 2016-07-12 07:34:36 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Yes, can you backport just the gdate gcc patch to krogoth and post the patch? Hi Ross, After backport the patch for pkgconfig-native, I found there are several native packages also build failed with gcc6: elfutils-natvie, rpm-native, binutils-native, glib-native, docbook-utils-native, gcc-cross. That means we need to backport a lot of patches and spend more time to test to make sure they work well on Fedora 24 and other distributions. How do you think about it? Or we just declare krogoth doesn't support Fedora 24 ? 63983 3 tim.orling 2016-07-14 15:00:29 +0000 Verified the failure. 64017 4 tim.orling 2016-07-15 01:53:19 +0000 poky-contrib timo/krogoth-9897 All packages mentioned above have been fixed with backports and cherry-picked commits. NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED with world build on Fedora-24. 64086 5 tim.orling 2016-07-17 18:42:46 +0000 Local world build also turned up nss-native. Additional patch sent to ML. Also available on timo/krogoth-nss-native poky-contrib branch. 64266 6 akuster 2016-07-21 15:04:10 +0000 Changes pulled into akuster/krogoth-next. waiting for window to run AB 64269 7 akuster 2016-07-21 15:16:36 +0000 build under way https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly/builds/950 64389 8 tim.orling 2016-07-23 15:54:01 +0000 AB nightly-world-lsb turned up two more failures: grub-eft-native - http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/72815/ qt4-native - http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/72816/ 64391 9 tim.orling 2016-07-23 21:53:51 +0000 Patches sent to mailing lists. 64596 10 tim.orling 2016-07-28 15:29:41 +0000 qt4-native is tracked in YOCTO #10039 Closing this bug since the rest of the patches have been merged.