| Summary: | "bitbake-layers show-layers" doesn't show layer if it doesn't append itself to BBFILE_COLLECTIONS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] BitBake | Reporter: | caio.oliveira |
| Component: | bitbake | Assignee: | Unassigned <unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | minor | ||
| Priority: | Medium+ | CC: | caio.oliveira, jay.shen.teoh, mshah, poky.bs.watcher, poky.watcher, randy.macleod, rebecca.swee.fun.chang |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 3.4 M3 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Don't know | |
|
Description
caio.oliveira
2017-08-31 23:45:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > If I create a layer with recipes, but without adding BBFILE_COLLECTIONS (and > a corresponding BBFILE_PATTERN_name), bitbake -s shows the recipes as > expected, but "bitbake-layers show-layers" do not show the layers. "bitbake > show-recipes" shows the recipes but with a layer as "?". > > I'm a bit unsure whether this is expected behavior or not. > > Tested with git at "main: Attempt to gain bitbake.lock rather than just > waiting" 8a60106c6f7d586c793b965c5e9460b6016fab15. Ideally, it is recommended to use bitbake-layers command to create a layer. It will help you to populate all the required configurations that you will need in your meta layer layer.conf file. Is there any work to do for this bug? -- Milan Shah Seems like there's no workaround for this issue. Developers are recommended to use bitbake-layers command to create a new layer with a basic directory structure to avoid any unexpected behavior. |