| Summary: | likely race in gcc-runtime's do_package_write_rpm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | California Sullivan <california.l.sullivan> | ||||
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Ross Burton <ross.burton> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | Medium+ | CC: | meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, richard.purdie, stephano | ||||
| Version: | 2.5 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | 2.5 M4 | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||||||
| OS: | Multiple | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- | ||||
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
California Sullivan
2018-03-14 14:46:44 UTC
Note that this is in shared-workdir and I doubt rpms should be touching a path in work-shared as the _builddir for rpm. This could be gcc-runtime racing against libgcc for packaging. Looking at the logs, "NOTE: recipe libgcc-7.3.0-r0: task do_package_write_rpm: Succeeded" is after the failure so this is very likely the case. May be worth trying changing the definition of _builddir in package_rpm.bbclass from S to B... I tried it locally and core-image-sato was able to build and boot, but more testing should probably be done. Merged in oe-core d6c13a5ff441f7076eb327c0d0b747bd7603db0f. |