Bug 13346

Summary:	rpm: package name not right for some packages
Product:	[Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core	Reporter:	Changqing Li <changqing.li>
Component:	core	Assignee:	Robert Yang <liezhi.yang>
Status:	RESOLVED NOTABUG	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Undecided	CC:	meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, richard.purdie
Version:	2.8
Target Milestone:	2.8
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Multiple
Whiteboard:
OS type for building Yocto:	---	Type of Regression:	---
Verified:		Documentation change:	No (bug/feature does not impact docs)

Description Changqing Li 2019-05-13 08:34:35 UTC

For example: 

tmp/deploy/rpm/i586$ rpm -qp --qf "%{name}\n" libestr0-0.1.11-r0.i586.rpm
libestr0

tmp/deploy/rpm/i586$ rpm -qp --qf "%{name}\n" libsdl2-2.0-0-2.0.9-r0.i586.rpm
libsdl2-2.0-0


Expected Result are:
libestr

libsdl2

Comment 1 Changqing Li 2019-05-13 09:30:39 UTC

another example:

/tmp/deploy/rpm/i586$ rpm -qp --qf "%{name}\n"  liblzo2-staticdev-2.10-r0.i586.rpm
liblzo2-staticdev


expect results:
lzo-staticdev

Comment 2 Richard Purdie 2019-05-16 14:45:40 UTC

These are actually correct, these are the names OE uses for these packages. The numbers come from debian.bbclass which renames packages to include some version information.