| Summary: | AB-INT: uki.UkiTest.test_uki_boot_systemd: basehash value changed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [QA/Testing] Runtime Testing | Reporter: | Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand> |
| Component: | general | Assignee: | Unassigned <unassigned> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium+ | CC: | paul, randy.macleod |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 6.1 M1 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | AB-INT | ||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Mathieu Dubois-Briand
2026-02-04 13:39:25 UTC
oe-selftest-fedora stream9-vk-1 mathieu/master-next completed at 2026-02-02 17:51:09+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3030/steps/15/logs/stdio oe-selftest-fedora alma9-vk-2 mathieu/master-next completed at 2026-02-03 20:17:05+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3035/steps/15/logs/stdio Paul, please add your analysis as a comment. In both cases the error described here happens after the error described in issue #16143 - "AB-INT: do_image_wic: tar command return exit status 2". It's unclear at this point exactly how the two issues relate, but the build environment may not be in a good state after the first error. We should look at this again once we understand the other issue more. We could artificially force earlier test case to fail and see if that causes this to reproduce. oe-selftest-fedora alma9-vk-2 mathieu/master-next completed at 2026-02-18 09:22:11+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3112/steps/15/logs/stdio oe-selftest-fedora rocky9-vk-1 mathieu/master-next&mathieu/master-next-tests completed at 2026-03-03 17:37:28+00:00 https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/48/builds/3208/steps/15/logs/stdio Both of the two most recent instances of this failure show that the pseudo abort described in #16143 happened before the non-deterministic metadata error. I don't really trust the system after those failures, and we haven't seen this issue in isolation so far. We have fixed the associated pseudo error, so can we close this and re-open if it reoccurs independently? The error means something corrupted bitbake's cache, bitbake is re-executing without re-validating it's cache, or the failing test caused an exit without cleaning up. Possibly a more general oe-selftest correctness issue. Needs investigation. |