| Summary: | [SugarBay] X server fails to start | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] BSPs | Reporter: | Laurentiu Serban <laurentiu.serban> | ||||||
| Component: | bsps-configuration | Assignee: | Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi> | ||||||
| Status: | VERIFIED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||||
| Priority: | High | CC: | dvhart, sgw, yp.bsp.watcher, yp.watcher | ||||||
| Version: | 1.3.1 | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | 1.3 M2 | ||||||||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||||||||
| OS: | x86_64 | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- | ||||||
| Verified: | Documentation change: | --- | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Laurentiu Serban
2012-06-14 15:40:16 UTC
The build used was the output of 13/06/2012 autobuilder could be a dup of 2608, need backtrace or console output. This is due I think to using random off-the-shelf hardware. We haven't seen problems on any of the customer reference boards - I just did a build and boot of master last night, and everything worked fine - networking and X included. I think the solution is that the Romania team needs to get customer reference boards for testing, just like PRC has. If we want to actually support this hardware, we can do that - we'll just need to address the differences in the BSP. For now, I'll assume that's what's wanted here and mark it as an enhancement. If that's not the case, please close this (if you think there really is a problem, you can make your image available to either me or PRC who have customer reference boards that we can test on until you get yours). Created attachment 586 [details]
X log
Created attachment 587 [details]
X log 1
What was the decision on this bug? Close as WILL_NOT_FIX or NOT_A_BUG and open a new bug to support a new machine? (In reply to comment #6) > What was the decision on this bug? Close as WILL_NOT_FIX or NOT_A_BUG and > open a new bug to support a new machine? That makes sense to me, but I'll let the originator do that... As per Darren's suggestion, closing this as NOTABUG - if it's desired that we support the Dell Vostro 460 MT, we can open a new bug specifically for that. Setting this to verified |