Bug 2773

Summary:	[multilib] no provider for lib64-perf/lsb-image
Product:	[Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core	Reporter:	Hongna Xu <hongnax.xu>
Component:	core	Assignee:	Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi>
Status:	RESOLVED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Medium	CC:	dvhart, jiajun.xu, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, ningx.ma, song.liu, yilongx.y.sun
Version:	1.3
Target Milestone:	1.4 M4
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Multiple
Whiteboard:
OS type for building Yocto:	---	Type of Regression:	---
Verified:		Documentation change:	---

Description Hongna Xu 2012-07-17 04:30:23 UTC

tree/branch: poky/master
commit: eb0cb7e8234f5d2e5623406e9660be91cf52f65e

With latest master, multilib build against lsb images could not pass. It reports no provider for lib64-perf

the logs are:
********************
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.15.2"
TARGET_ARCH       = "i586"
TARGET_OS         = "linux"
MACHINE           = "qemux86"
DISTRO            = "poky"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "1.2+snapshot-20120717"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "m32 i586"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta             
meta-yocto        = "master:eb0cb7e8234f5d2e5623406e9660be91cf52f65e"

NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'lib64-perf' (but virtual:multilib:lib64:/home/build/poky/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-core-tools-profile.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
NOTE: Runtime target 'lib64-perf' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['lib64-perf']
NOTE: Runtime target 'lib64-task-core-tools-profile' is unbuildable, removing...
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['lib64-task-core-tools-profile', 'lib64-perf']
ERROR: Required build target 'lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk' has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk', 'lib64-task-core-tools-profile', 'lib64-perf']

Summary: There was 1 WARNING message shown.
Summary: There were 2 ERROR messages shown, returning a non-zero exit code.
*************************

Comment 1 Darren Hart 2012-10-08 18:16:04 UTC

Tom, should we bump to 1.4?

Comment 2 Tom Zanussi 2012-10-08 18:51:09 UTC

Yeah, I actually don't think this is a problem any more, but will have to verify.

Comment 3 Darren Hart 2012-10-08 19:55:04 UTC

OK, marking as NEEDINFO until we know if this is still an open issue.

Comment 4 Tom Zanussi 2013-01-29 16:20:41 UTC

Not seeing the problem with current master.