| Summary: | DNF: Performance enhancement for Incremental Install | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Runtime] Package Management Issues | Reporter: | Mark Hatle <mark.hatle> |
| Component: | package-management-issues | Assignee: | Mark Hatle <mark.hatle> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | bluelightning, jessica.zhang, Qi.Chen, randy.macleod, richard.purdie, sgw |
| Version: | 1.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | Future | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Don't know | |
|
Description
Mark Hatle
2013-01-15 19:04:49 UTC
Should we still keep this open given that we've switched from Smart to DNF? The same issues may well apply with DNF, of course. I think it's worth changing this to DNF and at least investigating the performance issues. If current performance is deemed sufficient then we can close it. (I've not used the incremental install since DNF was introduced, so we might find that it's no longer working as well..) Reopen if needed by a specific performance problem is seen. |