| Summary: | /rpm/repodata is not created in autobuilder repository | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Stoicescu Cornel <corneliux.stoicescu> |
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Saul Wold <sgw> |
| Status: | VERIFIED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | bluelightning, elizabeth.flanagan, infras.ab.watcher, Infras.watcher, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, sgw |
| Version: | 1.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.4 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | --- | |
|
Description
Stoicescu Cornel
2013-02-22 15:12:53 UTC
Update: I see the repodata folder was moved to rpm/<architecture> . Is this correct? I'm not sure if this is correct for rpm generation, but the autobuilder just cp's whatever was created in the tmp/deploy/rpm directory. So, if this is incorrect behavior, this should end up as a bug against core and not the autobuilder. This is an expected change. With the introduction of Smart, we now create an index per package architecture so that we don't have to re-create the whole index every time the list of package architectures changes (which can happen between two different images e.g. in the case of multilib). Are there test cases or anything else that rely upon this data being available? I'm not sure we should be copying it around. There are no test cases in the master branch test plan that require the previous repodata structure. We ware not aware of the change and thus we filed a bug. I believe we can close as NOTABUG. OK, marking as suggested. Thanks! Verified as per above comments. |