| Summary: | gconv data needs virtual providers | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Ross Burton <ross.burton> |
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Unassigned <unassigned> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | bernhard.guillon, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, randy.macleod, richard.purdie, tim.orling, wen.yan.tan |
| Version: | 1.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 5.99 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Ross Burton
2013-05-22 13:40:46 UTC
I guess step one is determining what the names are for uclibc images. Still vaild Fixing this would clean up a lot of recipes in core. We'd want a runtime provides namespace and could then likely use RRECOMMENDS. Moving to 4.99 to highlight it would be good cleanup Hi all, can you please provide more information about this bug? I grepd the core layer and at least found glibc-charmap-iso-8859-1 for some dependency chains. In special interest for me would be recipes which would benefit from this cleanup. Greets, mr-nice poky/meta$ grep libc-glibc.*gconv -R
recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0_1.22.5.bb:RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:append:libc-glibc = " glibc-gconv-iso8859-5"
recipes-support/apr/apr-util_1.6.3.bb:RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:append:libc-glibc = " glibc-gconv-iso8859-1 glibc-gconv-iso8859-2 glibc-gconv-utf-7"
recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.21.0.bb:RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:append:libc-glibc = " glibc-utils glibc-gconv-utf-32"
recipes-devtools/mtools/mtools_4.0.43.bb:RDEPENDS:${PN}:libc-glibc = "glibc-gconv-ibm850"
recipes-connectivity/bluez5/bluez5.inc:RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:append:libc-glibc = " glibc-gconv-utf-16"
recipes-core/libxml/libxml2_2.11.5.bb:RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:append:libc-glibc = " glibc-gconv-ebcdic-us \
which shows a few recipes with glibc specific overrides and gconv dependencies in OE-Core
Hey RP, thanks for taking the time to clarify the scope of the bug! I will take a closer look at it. Greets, mr-nice Hi all, Is this still valid? Can you please provide more information about the objective? For those affected recipes in meta, we want to use virtual providers as well as using RRECOMMENDS? |