| Summary: | LSB printing tests: 11 failures for 'Printing Tests' | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Jackie Huang <jackie.huang> | ||||
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Yi Zhao <yi.zhao> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | hongxu.jia, liezhi.yang, mark.hatle, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, Qi.Chen, sgw, yi.zhao | ||||
| Version: | 1.5 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | Future | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||||||
| OS: | Multiple | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- | ||||
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Don't know | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
The systemd.bbclass now deletes files under /etc/init.d when 'sysvinit' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES and it detetes files under systemd_unitdir if 'systemd' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES. So is there any reason that a recipe inherits update-rc.d and it doesn't inherit systemd? //Chen Qi (In reply to comment #1) > The systemd.bbclass now deletes files under /etc/init.d when 'sysvinit' is > not in DISTRO_FEATURES and it detetes files under systemd_unitdir if > 'systemd' is not in DISTRO_FEATURES. > > So is there any reason that a recipe inherits update-rc.d and it doesn't > inherit systemd? > > //Chen Qi Please ignore this one... It is a known issue: https://lsbbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3629 As the latest comment said, the testcase should be waved. Wait for upstream to add problemreport keyword. Upstream bug, I will trace on it. Waiting For Upstream status is being removed, changing to Accepted. LSB support had been removed in oe-core: commit fb064356af615d67d85b65942103bf943d84d290 Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Date: Sun Aug 25 20:21:15 2019 +0300 Remove LSB support LSB as a standard isn't current and isn't well suited to embedded anyway. Its putting artifical constraints on the system and with modern layer technology, would now be better off as its own layer. As such its time to split it out. The only part with some (marginal) usage is lsb_release, which is split from the lsb package into an own lsb-release package. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> |
Created attachment 1484 [details] Detail logs of lsb printing tests 1) Add to locol.conf: IMAGE_OVERHEAD_FACTOR = "5" 2) bitbake core-image-lsb 3) $ runqemu qemux86-64 core-image-lsb ext3 nographic 4) root@qemux86-64:~# /usr/bin/LSB_Test.sh or run the printing tests on browser logs(detail logs attached): ============================= Test Name Severity Resolution /convenience/cupsConvenience 1 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 2 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 3 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 4 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 5 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 6 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 7 failed /convenience/cupsConvenience 8 unresolved /convenience/cupsConvenience 9 unresolved /convenience/cupsConvenience 10 unresolved /convenience/cupsConvenience 11 testsuite_error /convenience/cupsConvenience 11 unreported /testfoomaticrip/testfoomaticrip 13 failed (waived) Unknown /fhs/share-ppd/share-ppd 1 failed (waived) Still in transition Journal statistics: Tests Expected 97 Tests Total 65 Tests Passed 53 Tests Failed 11 Test suite errors 1 Waived problems 2 Tests not relevant/not applicable 1