| Summary: | gcc-cross-canadian package names should include the target architecture | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] Meta-yocto | Reporter: | Joshua Lock - Disabled <josh> |
| Component: | meta-yocto | Assignee: | Lianhao Lu <lianhao.lu> |
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | ke.yu, kevin.tian, lianhao.lu, poky.bs.watcher, poky.watcher, richard.purdie, sgw |
| Version: | 0.9 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.0 M1 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Program Management | Documentation change: | --- |
|
Description
Joshua Lock - Disabled
2010-11-10 03:42:20 UTC
To clarify, it has been noticed that the resulting package of a gcc-cross-canadian build is named simply "gcc-cross-canadian" i.e. gdb-cross-canadian-7.1-r1.i586.rpm Whereas the package should actually be named such that includes the target architecture, such as "gcc-cross-canadian-arm". As is each gcc-cross-canadian build will overwrite the package created in a previous gcc-cross-canadian build and it is not possible to install multiple cross-canadian compilers (supporting different target architectures) into an SDK sysroot. Fixed by the following commits: 322d6ab29902a51bd46303a4aed9f2b0b63cdb44 2021e2a74f4a8cb2066279e3006087fd3b198bc9 88ee037741b7e21ff50976a6c5b85278499655ca 05053efa86e457fd08785d1401365bd763342477 Verify these fixes are in and seem to be working, thanks. |