| Summary: | meta-openembedded/../fuse_2.9.3.bb by default doesn't add fusermount to image | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] Other YP Layers | Reporter: | George Nita <george.nita> | ||||
| Component: | layers | Assignee: | Saul Wold <sgw> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | Undecided | CC: | bluelightning, hongxu.jia, poky.bs.watcher, poky.watcher | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Other | ||||||
| OS: | ppc | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- | ||||
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
We don't track the meta-openembedded layer within the Yocto Project bugzilla, so I'm marking this as invalid. However, if you could send your patch to the openembedded-devel mailing list (with the prefix [meta-filesystems] since that's the layer the fuse recipe appears in, and also CC the layer maintainer hongxu.jia@windriver.com) that would be much appreciated. (Also, you don't need "Upstream Status" for patches to recipes themselves, only patches to source code where the patch is next to the recipe and referred to in SRC_URI.) Sorry, I meant the meta-openembedded repository above, rather than meta-openembedded layer. |
Created attachment 1843 [details] Proposed fix The PACKAGES line is currently: PACKAGES =+ "fuse-utils-dbg fuse-utils libulockmgr libulockmgr-dev libulockmgr-dbg" and no fusermount. Without fusermount the '/etc/init.d/fuse status' command exits with error.