| Summary: | Encourage best-practice configuration usage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Documentation] General Docs | Reporter: | Paul Eggleton <bluelightning> |
| Component: | docs-general | Assignee: | Antonin Godard <antonin.godard> |
| Status: | IN PROGRESS DESIGN --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | belen.barros.pena, bluelightning, kristi, mark.morton, michael.opdenacker, randy.macleod, richard.purdie, srifenbark, tim.orling |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 6.2 M4 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | 20 January 2015: IN PROGRESS DESIGN | ||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Yes (doc changes required) | |
|
Description
Paul Eggleton
2014-04-14 10:27:43 UTC
Setting this future. See Bug 5601 for related information that needs to be captured. Hi, I have created a form for the variables that uses a small PNG file to visually represent where a user would set a variable. For now, the PNG image is simply a placeholder. We need to agree on some short wordings to place in the figure to represent local.conf, machine conf file, user-doesn't set, etc. Part of this context information needs to be used for the documentation.conf file as well (see bug 5601 for related information). Once we get the context areas nailed down, we can include that information between each variable's <info></info> tag, which currently holds just the short description used by documentation.conf. You can see the work in progress at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref-variables-glos Scott Paul, I need to get some feedback from you on the PNG files we want to use here to indicate context for these variables. Once I have that, I can move forward. Scott Setting to 3.0 days. This bug has lost traction... At one point I had a small little figure worked out to tell the user where to best set a variable. Is that still a viable solution? Scott I can't recall if I saw any tests of this earlier, but I think so, yes. Ok - if it is still viable then I will try to get some progress on it with you Paul but after 2.4. Thanks Bulk move of 5.1 M4 to 5.2 M2 as approved by AlexB. Bulk move of bugs I am assigned to from Milestone 5.2M4 to 5.3M1. |