| Summary: | ROOTLESS_X should be used as default for Poky BSP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] BSPs | Reporter: | Jussi Kukkonen <jku> |
| Component: | bsps-configuration | Assignee: | Alejandro Hernandez <alejandro.hernandez> |
| Status: | RESOLVED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | benjamin.esquivel, richard.purdie, ross.burton, sgw, yp.bsp.watcher, yp.watcher |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 2.2 M1 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | Regression (Used to work) |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Don't know | |
|
Description
Jussi Kukkonen
2015-09-25 10:35:19 UTC
Currently we don't enable ROOTLESS_X by default in Poky (the Yocto Project Distro) at all, so why should we make a policy decision to enable ROOTLESS_X for meta-intel specifically, this would mean different BSPs have different distro policies. The enabling of ROOTLESS_X should be done at a Distro Level not BSP level. Are there specific issues that need to be addressed? I just completed a ROOTLESS_X = "1" build and booted with no issues. I guess I would like to understand the background of the discussion that was had with Ross and Richard. (In reply to comment #1) > Are there specific issues that need to be addressed? I just completed a > ROOTLESS_X = "1" build and booted with no issues. If we don't test it then it will be broken. If not now, then later. The last use of ROOTLESS_X in meta-intel I can find was in fact removed because it broke X. > I guess I would like to understand the background of the discussion that was > had with Ross and Richard. This was a short discussion on connman that was changing the build based on ROOTLESS_X quite needlessly: as an offshoot of that it was discovered that nothing actually tests ROOTLESS_X anymore. This was seen as Bad Thing so I promised to file a bug so we don't forget. The impression that it should be a bsp-specific decision was mine and could very well be wrong: I just knew that's how it was done before. (In reply to comment #1) > Currently we don't enable ROOTLESS_X by default in Poky (the Yocto Project > Distro) at all, so why should we make a policy decision to enable ROOTLESS_X > for meta-intel specifically, this would mean different BSPs have different > distro policies. > > The enabling of ROOTLESS_X should be done at a Distro Level not BSP level. > > Are there specific issues that need to be addressed? I just completed a > ROOTLESS_X = "1" build and booted with no issues. > > I guess I would like to understand the background of the discussion that was > had with Ross and Richard. After some discussion, it was decided that this should be done at a Distro level, as Saul was stating, so I am closing this. |