| Summary: | Error message not in log file | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Juro Bystricky <juro.bystricky> |
| Component: | devtools / tool chain | Assignee: | Unassigned <unassigned> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | liezhi.yang, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, mingli.yu, randy.macleod, richard.purdie |
| Version: | 1.7.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 4.99 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Juro Bystricky
2015-10-26 21:22:10 UTC
Juro, do you think this one is fixed with the recent pseudo patch (http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=7aba4c930e94316a90ada6022792ecb00ff2cf86 )? (In reply to comment #1) > Juro, do you think this one is fixed with the recent pseudo patch > (http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/ > ?id=7aba4c930e94316a90ada6022792ecb00ff2cf86 )? Depends how you define "fixed". If this is a pseudo error message, it should now end up in the pseudo error log. As the message explicitly says ERROR:...ignored, something else will eventually break (not being able to install correctly). So not being able to even glimpse the message may actually obfuscate the failed install even more. So IMHO the message should be made more prominent, not less. (Unless the pseudo log is parsed for errors at some point) Typical error will be something like: (see https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8581 ) chown: changing ownership of 'xxx': Operation not permitted So the root cause of the error is not obvious. However fixing it is quit simple: set NO32LIBS = "0" in local.conf. Having said this, it is very unlikely anyone will encounter this error with 2.1 and later. Mingli, The goal here is to ensure that if this error happens, that the root cause is reported clearly. Richard has suggested that you make a change to deliberately introduce a libpseudo error and then work on fixing the capture and reporting of such a fundamental error. Ask on the list if you need more guidance. We need to test this and see if it is still an issue... We added more logs to deal with the errors in inode mismatches but this error message is client-side in pseudo. A better diagnostic or early check would be good. |