Bug 9674

Summary:	Rename qemux86_64 to qemux86-64 in adt repo for 2.0.2 rc1
Product:	[Infrastructure] AutoBuilder	Reporter:	Yi Zhao <yi.zhao>
Component:	autobuilder	Assignee:	Bill Randle <bill.randle>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:	Yi Zhao <yi.zhao>
Severity:	normal
Priority:	Undecided	CC:	elizabeth.flanagan, infras.ab.watcher, Infras.watcher, jose.perez.carranza, ke.zou, yi.zhao
Version:	2.0.2
Target Milestone:	2.2 M1
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Multiple
Whiteboard:
OS type for building Yocto:	---	Type of Regression:	Regression (Used to work)
Verified:		Documentation change:	No (bug/feature does not impact docs)

Description Yi Zhao 2016-05-25 05:15:11 UTC

Please rename the directory name qemux86_64 to qemux86-64 in http://adtrepo-dev.yoctoproject.org/2.0.2-dade0e68c645473d94e1b05020b064df40677e81-jethro/rootfs/qemux86_64/ . Otherwise the adt-installer can not find the correct rootfs.

Comment 1 Bill Randle 2016-05-25 17:37:09 UTC

Rename done.

As an aside, it seems like it would be good to have some consistency in the x86_64/x86-64 naming. For instance, the directory in adt-ipk is named qemux86_64, yet in rootfs the directories are qemux86-64, and qemux86-64-lsb.

Comment 2 Yi Zhao 2016-05-27 02:36:56 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> Rename done.
> 
> As an aside, it seems like it would be good to have some consistency in the
> x86_64/x86-64 naming. For instance, the directory in adt-ipk is named
> qemux86_64, yet in rootfs the directories are qemux86-64, and qemux86-64-lsb.

The adt had been removed since yocto 2.1, there is no this annoying issue any more.

Verified it

Comment 3 Bill Randle 2016-05-27 02:51:05 UTC

Thanks for verifying. This was actually caused by a bug in one of the build step scripts, which has been fixed and pushed, so if we do any more 1.8.x or 2.0.x releases, this issue should not re-occur.