| Summary: | Suggested additions to the documentation on PR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Documentation] Reference | Reporter: | ulfalizer |
| Component: | handbook | Assignee: | Scott Rifenbark <srifenbark> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | bluelightning, poky.doc.watcher, poky.watcher, sgw, srifenbark |
| Version: | 2.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 2.2 M2 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | 30 June 2016: RESOLVED | ||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | Done (doc changes complete) | |
|
Description
ulfalizer
2016-06-28 20:22:21 UTC
Hi, See the http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PR description for PR with the changes. I did standard re-writing for a more active voice. Let me know if my changes altered technical meaning. Thanks, Scott (In reply to comment #1) > Hi, > > See the > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PR > description for PR with the changes. I did standard re-writing for a more > active voice. Let me know if my changes altered technical meaning. > > Thanks, > Scott This sounds a bit weird: "Packages have the same PV usually when the package manager installs the same upstream version and some of the packages include packaging fixes." I'd rewrite it as "A component having many packages with the same PV usually means that the packages all install the same upstream version, but with later (PR) version packages including packaging fixes." There's an extra comma after "because" in "Because, manually managing PR can be cumbersome and error-prone, an automated solution exists. See the "Working With a PR Service" section for more information." Got it... see http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PR. Anything further on this? Thanks, Scott Looks fine to me now. Thanks! Thanks! I am setting to RESOLVED and putting the doc flag to "done." Scott |