| Summary: | variable history for 'built-in' fragments could maybe be nicer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] BitBake | Reporter: | Yoann Congal <yoann.congal> |
| Component: | bitbake | Assignee: | Yoann Congal <yoann.congal> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | poky.bs.watcher, poky.watcher, richard.purdie |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 5.3 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Yoann Congal
2025-07-24 14:48:38 UTC
From: "Re: [PATCH 1/2] bitbake-setup: add the initial implementation" https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/17807 Note: history can be improved for 'built-in' fragments (machine/..., distro/...). The file-based one are fine. RFC patch sent : https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/topic/rfc_patch_ast_better/115674103 Patch sent: [PATCH] ast: Better variable history for builtin fragments: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/topic/patch_ast_better_variable/115735622 |