| Summary: | eglibc 2.16 compile fails with distro poky-tiny and x86_64 target | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Stefan Stanacar <sstncr> | ||||
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Saul Wold <sgw> | ||||
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | dvhart, meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | 1.3 M4 | ||||||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||||||
| OS: | Multiple | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | (Patch Review) | ||||||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- | ||||
| Verified: | Documentation change: | --- | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Stefan Stanacar
2012-08-14 13:08:22 UTC
Created attachment 689 [details]
log.do_compile poky-tiny x86_64
The issue seems to be that the poky-tiny has a limited set of DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC that does not include the libc-libm-big option, without this option the x86-64 build will include the dbl-wrap code instead of the dbl-64 as it likely should. I think that having DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC_TINY_x86-64_append = " libc-libm-big" (In reply to comment #2) > The issue seems to be that the poky-tiny has a limited set of > DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC that does not include the libc-libm-big option, without > this option the x86-64 build will include the dbl-wrap code instead of the > dbl-64 as it likely should. > > I think that having DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC_TINY_x86-64_append = " > libc-libm-big" Sounds reasonable. We can't really measure the delta as it doesn't build currently, but it would be nice to understand the added cost. Not really, there might be other issues with poky-tiny and x86-64, but I guess someone will get to them at some point! Verified in 1.3_M5:52850f0fc6f801298413ee779834b346ef7f48d6 |