Bug 2943 - eglibc 2.16 compile fails with distro poky-tiny and x86_64 target
Summary: eglibc 2.16 compile fails with distro poky-tiny and x86_64 target
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: OE-Core
Classification: Build System, Metadata & Runtime
Component: core (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86 Multiple
: Medium normal
Target Milestone: 1.3 M4
Assignee: Saul Wold
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: (Patch Review)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-14 13:08 UTC by Stefan Stanacar
Modified: 2012-09-25 11:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: ---

Attachments
log.do_compile poky-tiny x86_64 (212.08 KB, application/x-gzip)
2012-08-14 13:09 UTC, Stefan Stanacar 		no flags Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan Stanacar 2012-08-14 13:08:22 UTC 
bitbake eglibc fails at do_compile when using DISTRO ?= "poky-tiny" and  qemux86-64 target.

(opened a new bug for eglibc-2.16 as suggested in #2733)

[stefans@firebird ~]$ lsb_release -a; uname -a
LSB Version:	:core-4.1-amd64:core-4.1-noarch:cxx-4.1-amd64:cxx-4.1-noarch:desktop-4.1-amd64:desktop-4.1-noarch:languages-4.1-amd64:languages-4.1-noarch:printing-4.1-amd64:printing-4.1-noarch
Distributor ID:	Fedora
Description:	Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle)
Release:	17
Codename:	BeefyMiracle
Linux firebird 3.5.1-1.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Aug 9 17:50:43 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION        = "1.15.3"
TARGET_ARCH       = "x86_64"
TARGET_OS         = "linux"
MACHINE           = "qemux86-64"
DISTRO            = "poky-tiny"
DISTRO_VERSION    = "1.2+snapshot-20120814"
TUNE_FEATURES     = "m64"
TARGET_FPU        = ""
meta              
meta-yocto        = "master:efcb0a81d8ab5d8e250c677cd6919b19172683d1"
Comment 1 Stefan Stanacar 2012-08-14 13:09:41 UTC 
Created attachment 689 [details]
log.do_compile poky-tiny x86_64
Comment 2 Saul Wold 2012-08-29 00:50:01 UTC 
The issue seems to be that the poky-tiny has a limited set of DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC that does not include the libc-libm-big option, without this option the x86-64 build will include the dbl-wrap code instead of the dbl-64 as it likely should.

I think that having DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC_TINY_x86-64_append = " libc-libm-big"
Comment 3 Darren Hart 2012-08-29 17:45:01 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> The issue seems to be that the poky-tiny has a limited set of
> DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC that does not include the libc-libm-big option, without
> this option the x86-64 build will include the dbl-wrap code instead of the
> dbl-64 as it likely should.
> 
> I think that having DISTRO_FEATURES_LIBC_TINY_x86-64_append = "
> libc-libm-big"

Sounds reasonable. We can't really measure the delta as it doesn't build currently, but it would be nice to understand the added cost.
Comment 4 Saul Wold 2012-08-30 19:50:08 UTC 
Not really, there might be other issues with poky-tiny and x86-64, but I guess someone will get to them at some point!
Comment 6 Stefan Stanacar 2012-09-25 11:21:02 UTC 
Verified in 1.3_M5:52850f0fc6f801298413ee779834b346ef7f48d6