Bug 4328

Summary: packages: View detailed information about a package
Product: [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] Toaster Reporter: Belen Barros Pena <belen.barros.pena>
Component: toasterAssignee: Dave Lerner <dave.lerner>
Status: VERIFIED FIXED QA Contact: Yuan Sun <Yuan.Sun2>
Severity: enhancement    
Priority: Medium+ CC: alexandru.damian, dave.lerner, david.reyna, jessica.zhang, Yuan.Sun2
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: 1.6 M3   
Hardware: All   
OS: Multiple   
Whiteboard: GUI design available
OS type for building Yocto: --- Type of Regression: ---
Verified: Documentation change: No (bug/feature does not impact docs)
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 4674    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
none
Design 1.5.1 Package details
none
Design 1.1.1 Included package details none

Description Belen Barros Pena 2013-04-17 10:27:08 UTC
I should be able to see things like:

* generic information about the package (name, version, size, etc)

* dependencies and recommends

* information about package files

A complete list of information to be displayed for each package is TBC.

To get an idea of this feature, see:

http://www.yoctoproject.org/webhob/phase3_final_web_prototype/project-build-packages-busybox.html
Comment 1 Belen Barros Pena 2013-07-11 10:58:14 UTC
Move to M3 as part of milestone reallocation and after discussing with Alex
Comment 2 Belen Barros Pena 2013-09-16 15:20:13 UTC
Created attachment 1502 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 3 Belen Barros Pena 2013-09-25 13:45:27 UTC
Created attachment 1531 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 4 Belen Barros Pena 2013-10-02 16:34:20 UTC
Created attachment 1540 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 5 Belen Barros Pena 2013-10-02 16:36:02 UTC
Created attachment 1541 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 6 Belen Barros Pena 2013-10-04 16:26:01 UTC
Created attachment 1550 [details]
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Comment 7 Belen Barros Pena 2013-10-07 10:48:37 UTC
Created attachment 1552 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 8 Belen Barros Pena 2013-11-22 17:50:37 UTC
Created attachment 1646 [details]
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Comment 9 Belen Barros Pena 2013-11-22 17:51:00 UTC
Created attachment 1647 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 10 Belen Barros Pena 2013-12-18 11:49:29 UTC
Created attachment 1683 [details]
Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Comment 11 Belen Barros Pena 2013-12-18 11:49:50 UTC
Created attachment 1684 [details]
Design 1.5.1 Package details
Comment 12 David Reyna 2014-01-07 04:33:22 UTC
Dave Lerner is doing this one.
Comment 13 Belen Barros Pena 2014-01-29 17:31:30 UTC
Created attachment 1749 [details]
Design 1.1.1 Included package details

Added how to handle packages that have orm_package.name != orm_package.installed_name
Comment 14 Yuan Sun 2014-03-14 03:25:29 UTC
License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1 Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually.
May I file a defect?
Comment 15 Yuan Sun 2014-03-14 06:45:06 UTC
Reopened by Bug 5966.
Comment 17 Belen Barros Pena 2014-03-14 11:03:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #14)
> License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1
> Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually.
> May I file a defect?

Hi Yuan,

We are not currently collecting this information, and will not as part of the 1.6 release (see bug 5648). So we don't need an defect. 

Thanks!!
Comment 18 Yuan Sun 2014-03-17 02:18:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1
> > Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually.
> > May I file a defect?
> 
> Hi Yuan,
> 
> We are not currently collecting this information, and will not as part of
> the 1.6 release (see bug 5648). So we don't need an defect. 
> 
> Thanks!!

Hi Belen,
    Ok. I understand. Bug 4328 was resolved so I thinked features of attached design documents were implemented. I suggest that design documents should be updated.
    Thanks.
                Yuan
Comment 19 Belen Barros Pena 2014-03-19 16:03:56 UTC
As per Paul Eggleton's advise, closing main bugs when split (this one is replaced by bug 5966)
Comment 20 Yuan Sun 2014-04-04 06:29:41 UTC
Verified in 3e528d3e4bc542ca2f654c54363c56af0fb9f61b.