I should be able to see things like: * generic information about the package (name, version, size, etc) * dependencies and recommends * information about package files A complete list of information to be displayed for each package is TBC. To get an idea of this feature, see: http://www.yoctoproject.org/webhob/phase3_final_web_prototype/project-build-packages-busybox.html
Move to M3 as part of milestone reallocation and after discussing with Alex
Created attachment 1502 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1531 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1540 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1541 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1550 [details] Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Created attachment 1552 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1646 [details] Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Created attachment 1647 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Created attachment 1683 [details] Design 1.1.1 Included package details
Created attachment 1684 [details] Design 1.5.1 Package details
Dave Lerner is doing this one.
Created attachment 1749 [details] Design 1.1.1 Included package details Added how to handle packages that have orm_package.name != orm_package.installed_name
License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1 Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually. May I file a defect?
Reopened by Bug 5966.
test case: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/tr_show_case.cgi?case_id=906
(In reply to comment #14) > License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1 > Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually. > May I file a defect? Hi Yuan, We are not currently collecting this information, and will not as part of the 1.6 release (see bug 5648). So we don't need an defect. Thanks!!
(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #14) > > License files are included in package information according to "Design 1.5.1 > > Package details" pdf. However, it isn't included actually. > > May I file a defect? > > Hi Yuan, > > We are not currently collecting this information, and will not as part of > the 1.6 release (see bug 5648). So we don't need an defect. > > Thanks!! Hi Belen, Ok. I understand. Bug 4328 was resolved so I thinked features of attached design documents were implemented. I suggest that design documents should be updated. Thanks. Yuan
As per Paul Eggleton's advise, closing main bugs when split (this one is replaced by bug 5966)
Verified in 3e528d3e4bc542ca2f654c54363c56af0fb9f61b.