Bug 4578

Summary:	x32 ABI performance comparison
Product:	[Documentation] General Docs	Reporter:	Paul Eggleton <bluelightning>
Component:	docs-general	Assignee:	Unassigned <unassigned>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID	QA Contact:	Apoorv <apoorv.sangal>
Severity:	enhancement
Priority:	Medium	CC:	alexandru.c.georgescu, ionut.a.gavaz, jose.perez.carranza, nitin.a.kamble, richard.purdie, sgw
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	Future
Hardware:	x86
OS:	x86_64
Whiteboard:
OS type for building Yocto:	---	Type of Regression:	---
Verified:		Documentation change:	Yes (doc changes required)

Description Paul Eggleton 2013-05-30 16:52:27 UTC

Given how easy it is to build x32 images now it would be useful to do some performance analysis of the x32 ABI vs x86-64 on the same hardware, and produce a document presenting the results.

Comment 1 Scott Rifenbark 2013-06-03 11:54:38 UTC

So I guess the ultimate conclusion for this bug is some documentation that shows the performance comparisons.  I don't have that data so I am marking this as NEEDINFO.  

Please let me know when we get some information for it and I will work it into the documentation.

Scott

Comment 2 Saul Wold 2013-06-04 16:24:56 UTC

Possibly some QA resources could be used to do this?

Comment 3 Scott Rifenbark 2013-10-31 17:38:18 UTC

Setting target to "Future"

Comment 4 Richard Purdie 2014-05-29 15:11:31 UTC

Alex: Reassigning this to you to figure out what kind of comparison we could do as part of the other runtime benchmark work and to get the actual data.

Once you have some data, Scott will be able to find somewhere we can share it.

Comment 5 Anuj Mittal 2018-07-09 01:39:10 UTC

*** Bug 2552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Richard Purdie 2020-06-25 08:25:53 UTC

We don't publish performance data like this so its not something we plan to do.