Bug 4578 - x32 ABI performance comparison
Summary: x32 ABI performance comparison
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: General Docs
Classification: Documentation
Component: docs-general (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86 x86_64
: Medium enhancement
Target Milestone: Future
Assignee: Unassigned
QA Contact: Apoorv
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2552 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-05-30 16:52 UTC by Paul Eggleton
Modified: 2020-06-25 08:25 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: Yes (doc changes required)

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul Eggleton 2013-05-30 16:52:27 UTC 
Given how easy it is to build x32 images now it would be useful to do some performance analysis of the x32 ABI vs x86-64 on the same hardware, and produce a document presenting the results.
Comment 1 Scott Rifenbark 2013-06-03 11:54:38 UTC 
So I guess the ultimate conclusion for this bug is some documentation that shows the performance comparisons.  I don't have that data so I am marking this as NEEDINFO.  

Please let me know when we get some information for it and I will work it into the documentation.

Scott
Comment 2 Saul Wold 2013-06-04 16:24:56 UTC 
Possibly some QA resources could be used to do this?
Comment 3 Scott Rifenbark 2013-10-31 17:38:18 UTC 
Setting target to "Future"
Comment 4 Richard Purdie 2014-05-29 15:11:31 UTC 
Alex: Reassigning this to you to figure out what kind of comparison we could do as part of the other runtime benchmark work and to get the actual data.

Once you have some data, Scott will be able to find somewhere we can share it.
Comment 5 Anuj Mittal 2018-07-09 01:39:10 UTC 
*** Bug 2552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Richard Purdie 2020-06-25 08:25:53 UTC 
We don't publish performance data like this so its not something we plan to do.