| Summary: | perf test fails | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] BSPs | Reporter: | Andrei Gherzan <andrei> |
| Component: | bsps-meta-fsl-arm | Assignee: | Daiane <angolini> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | otavio, sgw, theodor |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.5.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | arm | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | New (Never tested) |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Andrei Gherzan
2013-09-09 16:30:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > When running "perf test -v 3", the test fails with this log: > > 1: vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: > --- start --- > Looking at the vmlinux_path (6 entries long) > Using /boot/vmlinux-3.0.35-4.0.0+yocto+g3383d80 for symbols > 0x8005b498: diff end addr for mx6_suspend v: 0x8005c643 k: 0x8005b5f7 > 0x8056ac60: diff end addr for __kprobes_text_end v: 0x805e0007 k: 0x8056b69f > 0x80693c16: _fw_end not on kallsyms > 0x807c2ade: _fw_end not on kallsyms > 0x809882c6: _fw_end not on kallsyms > 0x8098d410: kallsyms_addresses not on kallsyms > 0x809ba880: kallsyms_num_syms not on kallsyms > 0x809ba890: kallsyms_names not on kallsyms > 0x80a41a80: kallsyms_markers not on kallsyms > 0x80a41d60: kallsyms_token_table not on kallsyms > 0x80a420f0: kallsyms_token_index not on kallsyms > Maps only in vmlinux: > 80008110-80b2785f 0 [kernel].init > 80b27860-ffffffffffffffff 0 [kernel].data > Maps in vmlinux with a different name in kallsyms: > Maps only in kallsyms: > ---- end ---- > vmlinux symtab matches kallsyms: FAILED! > > We aware that in order to test this, vmlinux image must be installed > (linux-vmlinux). Will patch poky to have this as a rdepends to perf. So you got this fixed? Typo: We aware = be aware I don't have a fix for this yet. (In reply to comment #2) > Typo: We aware = be aware > > I don't have a fix for this yet. Good but are you looking at this? Hello Otavio, I invested a lot of time in this but it seems that I can't find the source of the issue. Maybe you can take a look too. Or a least give me a hint or so. Thanks, Andrei This needs to be check, so I am setting it to NEW. Following a long communication chain I ended on this link http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/181392/focus=181597 There is a hardware limitation in i.MX6 that don“t allow perf to work. |