| Summary: | deb, rpm and ipk packages have different naming formats | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core | Reporter: | Stoicescu Cornel <corneliux.stoicescu> |
| Component: | core | Assignee: | Paul Eggleton <bluelightning> |
| Status: | VERIFIED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Medium | CC: | meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher |
| Version: | 1.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | Future | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Stoicescu Cornel
2013-11-21 13:33:57 UTC
This is necessary for automating some builtime tests with oe-selftest. I'm fairly sure this is expected, although Richard comments that the deb naming might be broken and nobody noticed. I'd like to get an idea of what we're trying to do with the test and see if there is a different way of handling the situation than knowing the output file name format. I looked more into this and the package naming conventions ofr these formats are as follow: rpm: name-version-release.architecture.rpm deb: <foo>_<VersionNumber>-<DebianRevisionNumber>_<DebianArchitecture>.deb ipk: name_major.minor-wrt<revision>_arch.ipk This means the naming is correct. Marking as NOTABUG. Setting to verified. |