Bug 6741

Summary:	We should optionally support libubsan, liblsan, and so on.
Product:	[Build System, Metadata & Runtime] OE-Core	Reporter:	Seebs <seebs>
Component:	devtools / tool chain	Assignee:	Seebs <seebs>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	enhancement
Priority:	Medium	CC:	meta.mr.watcher, meta.watcher, ross.burton
Version:	1.7
Target Milestone:	Future
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Multiple
Whiteboard:
OS type for building Yocto:	---	Type of Regression:	---
Verified:		Documentation change:	No (bug/feature does not impact docs)

Description Seebs 2014-09-18 21:37:42 UTC

gcc has some code sanitizer features, which are currently neither built nor packaged so far as I know, but it might be nice to add support for them. (Noticed because one of our binary toolchains has the libraries, but nothing packages them yet.)

Comment 1 Ross Burton 2014-09-25 14:44:14 UTC

There's a patch on the list (http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/80369/) that adds a libsanitizer recipe, which packages:

/usr/lib/libasan.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib/liblsan.so.0.0.0
/usr/lib/libtsan.so.0.0.0
/usr/lib/libubsan.so.0.0.0

Is this everything you wanted?

Comment 2 Ross Burton 2015-06-01 19:18:17 UTC

The patch was merged as of 1709bf0c3a84bb04bc52e9104ad8e09fba6c6f91.