Bug 6741 - We should optionally support libubsan, liblsan, and so on.
Summary: We should optionally support libubsan, liblsan, and so on.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: OE-Core
Classification: Build System, Metadata & Runtime
Component: devtools / tool chain (show other bugs)
Version: 1.7
Hardware: x86 Multiple
: Medium enhancement
Target Milestone: Future
Assignee: Seebs
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-09-18 21:37 UTC by Seebs
Modified: 2015-06-01 19:18 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: No (bug/feature does not impact docs)

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Seebs 2014-09-18 21:37:42 UTC 
gcc has some code sanitizer features, which are currently neither built nor packaged so far as I know, but it might be nice to add support for them. (Noticed because one of our binary toolchains has the libraries, but nothing packages them yet.)
Comment 1 Ross Burton 2014-09-25 14:44:14 UTC 
There's a patch on the list (http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/80369/) that adds a libsanitizer recipe, which packages:

/usr/lib/libasan.so.1.0.0
/usr/lib/liblsan.so.0.0.0
/usr/lib/libtsan.so.0.0.0
/usr/lib/libubsan.so.0.0.0

Is this everything you wanted?
Comment 2 Ross Burton 2015-06-01 19:18:17 UTC 
The patch was merged as of 1709bf0c3a84bb04bc52e9104ad8e09fba6c6f91.