| Summary: |
Workflow docs should mention PR is usually redundant |
| Product: |
[Documentation] Development Manual
|
Reporter: |
Jussi Kukkonen <jku> |
| Component: |
development | Assignee: |
Scott Rifenbark <srifenbark> |
| Status: |
RESOLVED
FIXED
|
QA Contact: |
|
| Severity: |
normal
|
|
|
| Priority: |
Undecided
|
CC: |
richard.purdie, srifenbark
|
| Version: |
unspecified | |
|
| Target Milestone: |
--- | |
|
| Hardware: |
x86 | |
|
| OS: |
Multiple | |
|
| Whiteboard: |
17 March 2015: RESOLVED |
|
OS type for building Yocto:
|
---
|
Type of Regression:
|
---
|
|
Verified:
|
|
Documentation change:
|
Done (doc changes complete)
|
Workflow documentation probably should either not mention "PR" or should mention that typically it does not need to be included in recipes anymore. Currently all the workflows in section 4.3 include something like this (for git): > 11. Increment the Recipe Revision Number: Finally, don't forget > to 'bump' the PR value in the recipe since the resulting > packages have changed.