| Summary: | patchtest-oe: in case LIC_FILES_CHKSUM changed, make sure commit message indicates the reason | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Yocto Project Subprojects] Patchwork/Patchtest | Reporter: | Leonardo Sandoval Gonzalez <leonardo.sandoval.gonzalez> |
| Component: | Patchtest | Assignee: | Jose Lamego <jose.a.lamego> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | Medium+ | CC: | bluelightning, richard.purdie |
| Version: | 2.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 2.2 M2 | ||
| Hardware: | x86 | ||
| OS: | Multiple | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| OS type for building Yocto: | --- | Type of Regression: | --- |
| Verified: | Documentation change: | No (bug/feature does not impact docs) | |
|
Description
Leonardo Sandoval Gonzalez
2016-07-04 16:32:52 UTC
By "subject" you mean "commit message" here. (In reply to comment #1) > By "subject" you mean "commit message" here. patchtest at the end is using mboxes (which contain code changes in the payload), so in patchtest context is indeed a subject. The subject is the shortlog from the commit message, not the entire commit message. LIC_FILES_CHKSUM would typically be mentioned in the commit message but not the shortlog - hence in email terms it would not actually appear in the subject, just the message body. (In reply to comment #3) > The subject is the shortlog from the commit message, not the entire commit > message. LIC_FILES_CHKSUM would typically be mentioned in the commit message > but not the shortlog - hence in email terms it would not actually appear in > the subject, just the message body. I see. I was a misunderstood from my part. Thanks for clarifying this. |