http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#passing-host-options There is a very useful note in "2.4.2 Passing Host Options" part of the SDK manual where an example is given for fixing an old configure that doesn't recognize --with-libtool-sysroot. I think OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT is not a good choice for aclocal though, in the usual case the correct sysroot would be the target sysroot. In other words I believe the example aclocal call in the note should be: $ aclocal -I ${OECORE_TARGET_SYSROOT}/usr/share/aclocal \ [-I dir_containing_your_project-specific_m4_macros]
Hi Jussi, Here is the change... http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#passing-host-options. If good let me know. I will update the status of the bug. Scott
Setting myself to the CC list.
(In reply to comment #1) > Hi Jussi, > > Here is the change... > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#passing-host- > options. > > If good let me know. I will update the status of the bug. Yep, I believe that's (more often) correct. Thanks.
Thanks, I am setting the bug to RESOLVED and putting the doc flag to "done." Scott
Sorry to re-open. Can we change the list of commands in that section to be just: $ autoreconf -i -f -I ${OECORE_TARGET_SYSROOT}/usr/share/aclocal -I ${OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT}/usr/share/aclocal [-I dir_containing_your_project-specific_m4_macros] (one long line)
Ross, See http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.2/sdk-manual/sdk-manual.html#passing-host-options for the change. Let me know if this is okay and I will RESOLVE the bug again. Scott
Moving to 2.3 M2
I am setting this to RESOLVED and putting the doc flag to "done." No further feedback after implementing Ross' suggestion. Scott