At the moment when constructing the eSDK we use the directory name as the name for the core layer directory (to appear under layers/ within the SDK). This can end up with the name being "build" under certain circumstances e.g. when building the eSDK on the autobuilder. We should probably look for some other identifying name, perhaps from the git remote or something like that if available.

(This is a cosmetic issue only, there are no other ill effects.)