Bug 11013 - parselogs: Is failing on Xorg with error " FBDEV(0): mode "640x480" test failed "
Summary: parselogs: Is failing on Xorg with error " FBDEV(0): mode "640x480" test fail...
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: BSPs
Classification: Build System, Metadata & Runtime
Component: bsps-runtime (show other bugs)
Version: 2.3
Hardware: x86 Multiple
: Medium+ normal
Target Milestone: 2.3 M3
Assignee: Jose Perez C
QA Contact: oscar lopez arandas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-02-03 18:28 UTC by Jose Perez C
Modified: 2017-11-29 17:04 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: No (bug/feature does not impact docs)


Attachments
check dmesg (182.13 KB, image/png)
2017-11-29 16:49 UTC, oscar lopez arandas
no flags Details
full-log (106.39 KB, text/plain)
2017-11-29 16:51 UTC, oscar lopez arandas
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jose Perez C 2017-02-03 18:28:09 UTC
STATUS: IDLE
BUILD: 2.3_M2_rc3: 226a508da955439b881b2f0a544a3aee76e59919
ENVIRONMENT: qemu-x86
STEPS TO REPRODUCE: 

1. Boot image 
2. Check dmesg 
  
EXPECTED OUTCOME: 
  
 No errors or fails should be present in logs

ACTUAL OUTCOME:  

Central error: [    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed
***********************
[    40.824] (**) FBDEV(1): claimed PCI slot 0@0:2:0
[    40.824] (II) FBDEV(1): using default device
[    40.829] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
[    40.829] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[    40.840] (==) FBDEV(0): Depth 16, (==) framebuffer bpp 16
[    40.840] (==) FBDEV(0): RGB weight 565
[    40.851] (==) FBDEV(0): Default visual is TrueColor
[    40.851] (==) FBDEV(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
[    40.851] (II) FBDEV(0): hardware: VESA VGA (video memory: 16384kB)
[    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against framebuffer device...
[    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed
[    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed
[    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed
[    40.853] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" ok
[    40.853] (II) FBDEV(0): checking modes against monitor...
[    40.853] (--) FBDEV(0): Virtual size is 640x480 (pitch 640)
[    40.853] (**) FBDEV(0):  Mode "640x480": 36.0 MHz (scaled from 0.0 MHz), 43.3 kHz, 85.0 Hz
[    40.854] (II) FBDEV(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0   36.00  640 696 752 832  480 481 484 509 -hsync -vsync (43.3 kHz)
[    40.854] (==) FBDEV(0): DPI set to (96, 96)
[    40.854] (II) Loading sub module "fb"
[    40.854] (II) LoadModule: "fb"
[    40.861] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so
[    40.865] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"

***********************
Comment 1 Bruce Ashfield 2017-02-08 04:26:45 UTC
This doesn't seem related to the kernel or the BSP, did X update and now we are seeing this message ?

I'm bouncing this to Ross so he can add an opinion as well. If this looks like kernel .. send it back.
Comment 2 Ross Burton 2017-03-14 10:14:25 UTC
Jussi can you have a look?
Comment 3 Jussi Kukkonen 2017-03-14 14:20:34 UTC
Jose, which image is this exactly? core-image-sato?


(In reply to comment #0)
> Central error: [    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed

This is (II) so "informational".

> [    40.829] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.

This is an actual X error. I wonder if " (EE) " should be added to the list of strings that trigger this QA check...
Comment 4 Jose Perez C 2017-03-14 14:51:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Jose, which image is this exactly? core-image-sato?
> 
This is core-image-sato-sdk 
> 
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Central error: [    40.852] (II) FBDEV(0): 	mode "640x480" test failed
> 
> This is (II) so "informational".
> 
> > [    40.829] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
> 
> This is an actual X error. I wonder if " (EE) " should be added to the list
> of strings that trigger this QA check...
Comment 5 Jussi Kukkonen 2017-03-16 09:07:59 UTC
I can't reproduce the messages. I've tried building core-image-sato-sdk for qemux86 on both master and the m2 rc3 poky revision and running

  runqemu qemux86 kvm

I can't see anything like the messages in the original report. I'm a bit out of ideas, I think I need more specific reproduction instructions.

Alternatively, if you tell me how to run the QA images I can do that (I apparently have no idea how runqemu works nowadays, see bug 11170).

Please reassign to me when appropriate, thanks.
Comment 6 Jose Perez C 2017-03-16 21:03:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> I can't reproduce the messages. I've tried building core-image-sato-sdk for
> qemux86 on both master and the m2 rc3 poky revision and running
> 
>   runqemu qemux86 kvm
usually we just ran $runqemu qemux86 
> 
> I can't see anything like the messages in the original report. I'm a bit out
> of ideas, I think I need more specific reproduction instructions.
> 
> Alternatively, if you tell me how to run the QA images I can do that (I
> apparently have no idea how runqemu works nowadays, see bug 11170).
> 
> Please reassign to me when appropriate, thanks.
I did a couple on test on master and cannot reproduce this issue so maybe was a corner case. will close this issue as invalid and will reopen if I saw it again.
Comment 7 oscar lopez arandas 2017-11-29 16:49:06 UTC
not presented errors in Xorg all  task whit xorg-lib pass success

COMMIT: 226a508da955439b881b2f0a544a3aee76e59919
ENVIRONMENT: qemux86
STEPS TO REPRODUCE: 

1. Boot image 
2. Check dmesg 
  
EXPECTED OUTCOME: 
  
 No errors or fails should be present in logs

ACTUAL OUTCOME:
No errors or fails should be present in logs

===============================================================================
NOTE: Running task 384 of 410 (virtual:native:/home/oscar/quemux/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxrandr_1.5.1.bb:do_configure)
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_configure: Started
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_configure: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 385 of 410 (virtual:native:/home/oscar/quemux/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxrandr_1.5.1.bb:do_compile)
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_compile: Started
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_compile: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 386 of 410 (virtual:native:/home/oscar/quemux/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxrandr_1.5.1.bb:do_install)
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_install: Started
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_install: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 387 of 410 (virtual:native:/home/oscar/quemux/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libxrandr_1.5.1.bb:do_populate_sysroot)
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_populate_sysroot: Started
NOTE: recipe libxrandr-native-1_1.5.1-r0: task do_populate_sysroot: Succeeded
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 410 tasks of which 0 didn't need to be rerun and all succeeded.

===============================================================================
full-log and screen shot for qemux86 dmesg in attachment
Comment 8 oscar lopez arandas 2017-11-29 16:49:52 UTC
Created attachment 4135 [details]
check dmesg
Comment 9 oscar lopez arandas 2017-11-29 16:51:50 UTC
Created attachment 4136 [details]
full-log
Comment 10 oscar lopez arandas 2017-11-29 17:04:16 UTC
I miss putting in verified