Created attachment 4089 [details] CreateAutoConf yoctoio-autobuilder-ubuntu1704 NOTE: core-image-lsb-sdk-1.0-r0 do_testimage: ====================================================================== NOTE: core-image-lsb-sdk-1.0-r0 do_testimage: FAIL: test_dnf_install_from_disk (dnf.DnfRepoTest) NOTE: core-image-lsb-sdk-1.0-r0 do_testimage: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: core-image-lsb-sdk-1.0-r0 do_testimage: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-ppc-lsb/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", line 32, in wrapped_f return func(*args, **kwargs) File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-ppc-lsb/build/meta/lib/oeqa/core/decorator/__init__.py", line 32, in wrapped_f return func(*args, **kwargs) File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-ppc-lsb/build/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py", line 103, in test_dnf_install_from_disk self.dnf_with_repo('install -y --downloadonly run-postinsts-dev') File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-ppc-lsb/build/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py", line 70, in dnf_with_repo self.dnf(" ".join(cmdlinerepoopts) + " --nogpgcheck " + command) File "/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-ppc-lsb/build/meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/dnf.py", line 18, in dnf self.assertEqual(status, expected, message) AssertionError: 143 != 0 : dnf --repofrompath=oe-testimage-repo-noarch,http://192.168.7.3:44695/noarch --repofrompath=oe-testimage-repo-qemuppc,http://192.168.7.3:44695/qemuppc --repofrompath=oe-testimage-repo-ppc7400,http://192.168.7.3:44695/ppc7400 --nogpgcheck install -y --downloadonly run-postinsts-dev Process killed - no output for 1500 seconds. Total running time: 1506 seconds.
Armin, Yi, Is this 100% reproducible?
(In reply to comment #1) > Armin, Yi, Is this 100% reproducible? I can not reproduce it with rocko branch. Yi
This is M+ M1 with backport requests for 2.3 and 2.4 but I can't see anything beyond "qemu died mysteriously, logs are lost". Was there a discussion on the triage call that wasn't captured in the bug?
Richard was concerned about qemuppc failing periodically so we didn't want to just close this defect without finding out more about its reproducibility. I believe that the primary problem of qemuppc flakiness may be due to: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209 Unless Armin protests, let's close this defect as can't reproduce.
(In reply to comment #4) > Richard was concerned about qemuppc failing periodically so we didn't want > to just close this defect without finding out more about its reproducibility. > > I believe that the primary problem of qemuppc flakiness may be due to: > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12209 > > Unless Armin protests, let's close this defect as can't reproduce. ok
Agreed. Closing invalid as discussed.