Bug 2100 - [Hob2] Provide visual feedback when removing recipes, packages or tasks.
Summary: [Hob2] Provide visual feedback when removing recipes, packages or tasks.
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Hob
Classification: Build System, Metadata & Runtime
Component: hob (show other bugs)
Version: 1.2
Hardware: x86 Multiple
: Medium enhancement
Target Milestone: 1.2 M4
Assignee: anliming
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: Done
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-14 12:13 UTC by Giulia
Modified: 2012-04-18 17:47 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Giulia 2012-03-14 12:13:19 UTC 
The removed item should fade out, and the rows below it should slide up. (5 DAYS implementation)
Comment 1 Belen Barros Pena 2012-03-21 12:18:36 UTC 
Any reason why this has been "demoted" to enhancement? ;) Is it because implemented the suggested animation is hard? Just wondering...

This is actually quite important from a UI point of view. It's not about the animation: it's about providing feedback to users about Hob's actions and states. The animation is only the medium we are using to provide system feedback.

Cheers

Belen
Comment 2 Shane Wang 2012-03-27 12:07:22 UTC 
No, belen, we need to prioritize to fix those high bugs first when Apr 20 (the release date) is coming.;-)

Although that was an enhancement bug, its target milestone is still 1.2 M4.

Don't worry.
Comment 3 Belen Barros Pena 2012-03-27 14:54:09 UTC 
not worried at all! :) Thanks for explaining.
Comment 5 Belen Barros Pena 2012-04-17 11:08:16 UTC 
This is pretty good work. The only strange thing is that the item(s) being removed and bumped up to the top of the list. 

This behaviour is a bit strange. I guess you are trying to make sure users have visibility of what's being removed, but the result is strange nonetheless. Maybe we can refine in 1.3