2 of 7 Test cases fails when running the ABAT test case: Output here: Detect Xorg directory automatically... Xorg directory is /usr Dynamic library path check......................... Dynamic library'path check PASS ! [WARNING] Xorg has started! Start up the X server PASS! module checking.......................... module [intel_agp] check FAIL, please load it manually! module [i915] check FAIL, please load it manually! i915 has been built in kernel! Please ignore above error info! module checking PASS! glxinfo : /usr/bin/glxinfo run glxinfo: /usr/bin/glxinfo.... direct rendering is DISABLED! Xorg support XVideo extension, PASS! Xorg support VidMode extension, PASS! start glxgears: /usr/bin/glxgears............ Error: couldn't get an RGB, Double-buffered visual glxgears fail to run, FAIL! Video Adaptor is Intel's, PASS! ===================================================== ABAT test finished! PASS 5/FAIL 2/SKIP 1 ===================================================== root@crownbay-noemgd:~/abat#
Was this with an image with accelerated graphics support? Which image did you test?
Slex, specifically was this a crownbay or a crownbay-emgd image?
Hi, I burned this image: http://autobuilder03.jf.intel.com/pub/nightly-meta-intel/20120712-1/machines/crownbay-noemgd/core-image-sato-sdk-crownbay-noemgd.iso on a DVD then installed it on the Crownbay system. So a noemgd image was used. Thanks, Alex.
(In reply to comment #3) > Hi, > I burned this image: > http://autobuilder03.jf.intel.com/pub/nightly-meta-intel/20120712-1/machines/ > crownbay-noemgd/core-image-sato-sdk-crownbay-noemgd.iso on a DVD then > installed it on the Crownbay system. > > So a noemgd image was used. > I'll ask Tom to confirm, but I believe this is expected behavior for a noemgd image which does not have 3D acceleration. Tom, if you concur, please close out as NOTABUG.
Right, we haven't cared about or tested 3D on the -noemgd images to this point.
verified as per above comments.