Bug 2870 - quicky N/A in e-Menlow sato image
Summary: quicky N/A in e-Menlow sato image
Status: VERIFIED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: BSPs
Classification: Build System, Metadata & Runtime
Component: bsps-meta-intel (show other bugs)
Version: 1.3
Hardware: E-Menlow Multiple
: Undecided normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nitin Kamble
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-07-31 14:04 UTC by Alexandru Georgescu
Modified: 2012-08-01 11:12 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandru Georgescu 2012-07-31 14:04:42 UTC 
IMAGE USED:
http://autobuilder03.jf.intel.com/pub/nightly-meta-intel/20120730-2/machines/emenlow/core-image-sato-emenlow-20120730042252.hddimg


Quicky is not installed in the e-menlow sato image:

root@emenlow:~/abat# which quicky
root@emenlow:~/abat# quicky
-sh: quicky: command not found
Comment 1 Darren Hart 2012-07-31 16:52:46 UTC 
Is quicky supposed to be installed on all sato images?
Comment 2 Nitin Kamble 2012-08-01 04:50:21 UTC 
Tom, 
  Is quicky is supposed to be part of core-image-sato ? I guess not.

Then, what is the recommended way to get quicky in the image for testing ?
Comment 3 Tom Zanussi 2012-08-01 05:09:18 UTC 
I don't know - you'd have to follow the dependency chains of what's included in the image to know.  If not and you need it for testing, I'd guess just use one of the standard mechanisms for including packages in images to put it there?
Comment 4 Nitin Kamble 2012-08-01 05:20:08 UTC 
Tom,
  Then we need to find out how PRC QA people used quicky. Whom do we ask this question in PRC ?
Comment 5 Tom Zanussi 2012-08-01 05:23:51 UTC 
I think Jiajun did this, but maybe Shane is the only one left to ask at this point?  Not sure, but Song should have a handle on who to ask about QA questions, so I would ask him to coordinate.  I'm surprised there wasn't a knowledge transfer between PRC and Romania to cover all this (and also to transfer hardware).
Comment 6 Nitin Kamble 2012-08-01 06:11:04 UTC 
Jiajun, Shane, Song, 

  Can you help here with the knowledge transfer from PRC QA team to Romania QA team?

Thanks,
Nitin
Comment 7 Nitin Kamble 2012-08-01 06:13:09 UTC 
Jiajun, Shane, Song, please respond to the comments on this bug.

Thanks,
Nitin
Comment 8 Jiajun Xu 2012-08-01 06:15:26 UTC 
(In reply to comment #7)
> Jiajun, Shane, Song, please respond to the comments on this bug.

Thanks,
> Nitin

Hi Nitin,
We should only test quicky in sato-sdk image, not sato image.
Comment 9 Nitin Kamble 2012-08-01 07:09:08 UTC 
Alexandru, 
  I think Jiajun's answer closes the bug. In the future for such kind of QA bugs make sure to CC Jiajun, so that such kind of misunderstandings can be avoided earlier.

Thanks,
Nitin
Comment 10 Alexandru Georgescu 2012-08-01 11:12:09 UTC 
Ok,

Thanks for the info,
Alex.