Bug 5477 - Check for any performance degradations with gcc security flags enabled
Summary: Check for any performance degradations with gcc security flags enabled
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Test Plans/Suite
Classification: QA/Testing
Component: test-plans/suite (show other bugs)
Version: 1.6
Hardware: x86 Multiple
: Medium+ enhancement
Target Milestone: 2.3 M2
Assignee: Humberto Ibarra
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends on: 5478
Blocks: 4144
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-11-05 16:27 UTC by Alexandru Georgescu
Modified: 2017-12-06 16:47 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
OS type for building Yocto: ---
Type of Regression: ---
Verified:
Documentation change: Don't know

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandru Georgescu 2013-11-05 16:27:26 UTC 
This is an umbrella bug for testing the performance affected by enabling the gcc security flags.
The performance targeted splits in two parts: 

1. Test if build time performance is affected
2. Test if runtime performance is affected

I will add further comments with new bugs and dependent bugs.
Comment 1 Alexandru Georgescu 2013-11-05 16:29:49 UTC 
Added 4144 - Run time performance data for the the runtime performance part
Comment 2 Alexandru Georgescu 2013-11-05 16:37:25 UTC 
Added "5478 - [QA] - test build time performance degradations with gcc security flags enabled" for testing the build time performance.
Comment 3 Alexandru Georgescu 2014-04-23 09:06:51 UTC 
closing wince [qa] tracking bugs won't be used starting 1.7
Comment 4 Alexandru Georgescu 2014-04-24 09:45:52 UTC 
reopened since this is not a tracking bug
Comment 5 Ionut Chisanovici 2014-07-08 09:09:10 UTC 
Moved to M4 as we want to use Lava server as a data collection tool for the performance testing.
As agreed with RP and Paul E., we will first start with Lava installation then we should start collection boot time for the images.

Cheers,
Ionut C
Comment 6 Alexandru Georgescu 2015-11-10 11:24:22 UTC 
Added an estimate but this needs to be re-discussed.
Comment 7 Humberto Ibarra 2017-01-22 13:12:27 UTC 
Dependency and umbrella bug were marked obsolete as part of the runtime performance bug restructuring. The bugs were years old and did not reflect the current implementation in the best of ways. Bug #10951 was opened as the new umbrella for runtime performance. If it still makes sense to have this a new bug will be opened as dependency for 10951.